The Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget issued this memo for the heads of executive departments and agencies that emphasizes Management’s Responsibility for Enterprise Risk Management and Internal Controls.Download the Memo
2022 OIG’s Top Unimplemented Recommendations: Solutions To Reduce Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in HHS Programs
The OIG’s Top Unimplemented Recommendations: Solutions To Reduce Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in HHS Programs is an annual publication of the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General. In this edition, they focus on the top 25 unimplemented recommendations that, in OIG’s view, would most positively affect HHS programs in terms of cost savings, program effectiveness and efficiency, and public health and safety if implemented.Download the Checklist
Federal Enterprise Risk Management 2020 Survey Results
See the results from the 2020 Federal ERM Survey conducted by AFERM and GuidehouseView Results
Federal Enterprise Risk Management 2019 Survey Results
See the results from the 2019 Federal ERM Survey conducted by AFERM and GuidehouseDownload Results
Federal Enterprise Risk Management 2018 Survey Results
See the results from the 2018 Federal ERM Survey conducted by AFERM and GuidehouseDownload Results
Federal Enterprise Risk Management 2017 Survey Results
See the results from the 2017 Federal ERM Survey conducted by AFERM and PwCDownload Results
Federal Enterprise Risk Management 2016 Survey Results
See the results from the 2016 Federal ERM Survey conducted by AFERM and PwCDownload Results
Mastering Risk: Ways To Advance Enterprise Risk Management Across Government
This Resource has been removed due to a citation error.
Risk Management in the AI Era: Navigating the Opportunities and Challenges of AI Tools in the Public Sector
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has moved into the mainstream of businesses and government.
Business leaders are rushing to take advantages of the benefits that can be brought to a wide array of industries to help increase productivity. Government leaders are also moving forward, but with appropriate caution. When considering the use and application of AI related technologies, government leaders weigh different factors than their private sector counterparts. Whether it is deploying self-driving electric trolleys in a city or retrofitting city streetlights with sensors to make them “smarter,” these leaders must address issues of accountability, transparency, ethics, equity, common good, effectiveness, efficiency, managerial capacity, and political legitimacy.
The report authors put forth a threefold strategy to assist government leaders and public managers with how best to approach using AI, which includes:
- reviews of prior federal government studies on the use and application of AI. These reports reflect a number of important issues for agencies and stakeholders to consider as they begin incorporating AI; the studies also highlight the government’s broad risk management approach to AI
- a risk management framework for when and how government can and should consider using AI tools, how to use these tools, and which organizational tasks and decisions may benefit from the use of AI
- case studies of two innovative uses of AI tools to help manage risks from local governments: the City of Syracuse, New York, and the City of Bryan, Texas.
The authors close with a list of practical guidelines for government action in using AI tools to improve the overall quality of governance, while incorporating similar tools into their overall risk management strategy.
Getting Ahead of Risks Before They Become Government Failures
An Imperative for Agency Leaders to Embrace Enterprise Risk Management
Several recent reports and studies have detailed a range of worsening trends and developments that are creating an increased risk for significant government failure. Many of the reports offer recommendations for action by Congress and the Administration. However, they do not go as far to suggest and recognize what agency leaders can do, and in many cases are doing, to help address these challenges. This paper, from the Senior Executives Association (SEA) and the Association for Federal Enterprise Risk Management (AFERM), aims to highlight how agency leaders can use enterprise risk management to reduce the risk of government failure while increasing the likelihood for the successful delivery of agency missions.