This Resource has been removed due to a citation error.
This Resource has been removed due to a citation error.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has moved into the mainstream of businesses and government.
Business leaders are rushing to take advantages of the benefits that can be brought to a wide array of industries to help increase productivity. Government leaders are also moving forward, but with appropriate caution. When considering the use and application of AI related technologies, government leaders weigh different factors than their private sector counterparts. Whether it is deploying self-driving electric trolleys in a city or retrofitting city streetlights with sensors to make them “smarter,” these leaders must address issues of accountability, transparency, ethics, equity, common good, effectiveness, efficiency, managerial capacity, and political legitimacy.
The report authors put forth a threefold strategy to assist government leaders and public managers with how best to approach using AI, which includes:
The authors close with a list of practical guidelines for government action in using AI tools to improve the overall quality of governance, while incorporating similar tools into their overall risk management strategy.
The purpose of this form is to provide a consistent framework for the Service that can be leveraged within a unit’s existing governance or management approval processes to clearly document business decisions in the context of risk appetite and/or acceptance. This document can be used in various ways, including the following:
1) a framework to assess various options in making decisions for achievement of objectives,
2) a guide to articulate rationale behind those decisions within the context of risk appetite, and
3) a documentation trail to support these business decisions. Refer to the end of this document for instructions and additional guidance regarding use of the tool.
For this tool, right-click and save the document to your computer for full use.
This flyer outlines the value that Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) can provide to government leaders.
The Enterprise Risk Channel provides a mechanism for employees to send potential risks to the Office of the Chief Risk Officer on a confidential basis. This sample form has been provided by the IRS.
Several recent reports and studies have detailed a range of worsening trends and developments that are creating an increased risk for significant government failure. Many of the reports offer recommendations for action by Congress and the Administration. However, they do not go as far to suggest and recognize what agency leaders can do, and in many cases are doing, to help address these challenges. This paper, from the Senior Executives Association (SEA) and the Association for Federal Enterprise Risk Management (AFERM), aims to highlight how agency leaders can use enterprise risk management to reduce the risk of government failure while increasing the likelihood for the successful delivery of agency missions.
On April 16, 2018, the Association of Government Accountants (AGA) and the Association for Federal Enterprise Risk Management (AFERM) held the second annual enterprise risk management (ERM) workshop with federal government professionals. This workshop provided an opportunity for over 150 professionals to hear ERM thought leadership from senior government leaders and discuss with their colleagues how ERM can, and is, driving organizational value and enhancing performance. This summary report shares the information discussed during this workshop.
Speakers: Chris Mandel, Sedgwick Institute; Mahesh Joshi, GMU; Joe Pugh, AARP
Download
Tool or templates are only as good as the information input and how effectively their outputs put the right information in front of the right people at the right time. During this session, attendees learned how federal ERM programs have developed and deployed tools to support their programs’ maturation. Organizations beginning their ERM journeys can learn what tools provided the greatest value to the ERM program and organizational leadership from the initial stages of ERM implementation. While organizations with mature ERM programs can hear how tools continue to support organizations in making risk-informed decisions.
Speakers: Doug Clift, Census Bureau; Greg Keith, Ginnie Mae; Jason Leecost, Ginnie Mae; Debra Elkins, HHS
Download
Speakers: Nahla Ivy, NIST; April Szuchyt, NIST
Download